The handoff is the whole point. Marketing nominates an MQL, sales accepts or rejects it and an accepted lead becomes an SQL. That acceptance step is what keeps marketing honest and stops bad leads being counted as wins.
The definition lives in the acceptance criteria sales agrees to. Get that wrong and the MQL to SQL rate becomes meaningless, see MQL.
The share of MQLs that become SQLs is the clearest signal of whether marketing and sales agree. A very low rate means marketing's bar is too loose. A very high rate can mean it is too strict and you are leaving leads on the table.
Like all benchmarks, the absolute number matters less than your trend on a shared definition. Chase agreement between the teams, not a percentage from a blog post.
Define exactly what sales checks before accepting. Vague criteria make the SQL label meaningless.
Sales should log why it rejects a lead so marketing can fix the source.
A monthly MQL-SQL review keeps both teams aligned as the ICP shifts.
Some channels produce SQLs, others produce noise. Fund the ones that convert.
An MQL that sales has reviewed and accepted as worth actively pursuing.
An MQL is marketing's nomination. An SQL is sales accepting it. The acceptance step is the difference.
Sales does, by applying agreed acceptance criteria to the MQLs marketing passes over.
It varies by motion and ACV. What matters is a stable rate on a definition both teams agreed and a feedback loop when it drifts.
The 30-minute audit includes where your MQL to SQL handoff leaks. No sales sequence.
Book the 30-minute audit →