Two axes, not one. Fit tells you whether they should buy. Behaviour tells you whether they are ready to. A lead high on both is hot. High on one and low on the other means very different next steps.
The trap is over-engineering the weights. Start simple, validate against real conversions and adjust, see MQL for where the score feeds.
Teams love to assign points to dozens of actions, most of which do not predict anything. A model with five well-chosen signals usually beats one with forty guessed ones.
The only validation that matters is whether high-scoring leads actually convert better than low-scoring ones. If they do not, the model is decoration, not a tool.
Keep the two axes distinct so a bad-fit, high-activity lead never scores hot.
Use the few actions that actually predict conversion, not everything you can track.
Check that high scores really do convert better. If not, fix the weights.
A demo request from six months ago is not current intent. Let behaviour scores fade.
Ranking leads by how likely they are to buy, usually by combining a fit score with a behaviour score.
Fit, how well the lead matches your ICP and behaviour, what actions they have taken that predict intent.
Because teams assign points to many actions that do not predict conversion. A few well-chosen signals usually work better.
High-scoring leads should convert at a higher rate than low-scoring ones. If they do not, the model needs fixing.
The 30-minute audit includes whether your lead score predicts conversion or just adds noise. No sales sequence.
Book the 30-minute audit →