The promise is timing. Instead of guessing who is in-market, you act on signals that they are. The risk is acting on weak signals or in ways that feel like surveillance, which kills trust faster than it builds pipeline.
First-party intent is stronger and free. Start there before you pay a vendor for third-party signals, see lead scoring for how to weight it.
First-party intent, from your own site and product, is the most reliable because you can see exactly what happened. Third-party intent, bought from vendors, is broader but noisier and usually resolves to an account rather than a person.
A useful rule is to act hard on first-party signals and treat third-party as a prioritisation hint, not a trigger for aggressive outreach. The strongest programs blend both rather than betting the budget on bought data.
Your own pricing-page and product signals beat any vendor feed. Mine them before you buy data.
Use intent to prioritise a list, not to fire an aggressive sequence at a weak signal.
Referencing research a buyer never shared with you feels like surveillance. Use intent to time outreach, not to script it.
Intent without ICP fit is noise. A bad-fit account researching you is still a bad-fit account.
Behavioural information that signals a person or account is actively researching a purchase, used to prioritise outreach and ad spend.
First-party comes from your own site and product and is reliable. Third-party is bought from vendors, is broader and noisier and usually resolves to an account.
Use it to time and prioritise outreach, not to reference research the buyer never shared with you. Acting on weak signals erodes trust.
Often the first-party intent you already have is underused. Mine that before paying a vendor for third-party signals.
The 30-minute audit includes whether your first-party intent data is feeding prioritisation or going to waste. No sales sequence.
Book the 30-minute audit →