It is the metric every term sheet hinges on. Two companies at the same ARR are worth very different multiples if one is growing 120% and the other 30%. Growth rate also decays predictably as you scale, so the bar shifts. 100% growth at $1M ARR is ordinary. 100% at $20M ARR is rare.
Run your own numbers with the free ARR growth rate calculator. Drop in two ARR figures and it returns the rate plus the implied doubling time.
The benchmark moves with scale. Below $1M ARR, triple-digit growth is common because the base is tiny. Between $1M and $10M, the T2D3 path (triple, triple, double, double, double) is the venture-backed standard. Past $10M, sustained growth above 60% puts you in the top decile.
Efficiency matters as much as the rate now. A 2026 investor discounts fast growth bought with a burn multiple above 2. The prize is growth that holds its rate while net revenue retention carries a chunk of it, because expansion revenue is cheaper than new logos.
Every point of churn is a point you have to re-earn before you grow. Cutting gross churn from 2% to 1% monthly does more for the rate than a new acquisition channel and it costs less.
Net revenue retention above 110% means the existing base grows on its own. That is compounding you do not pay CAC for and it is the cleanest way to hold a high rate as you scale.
Faster deals mean more bookings land inside the period. Tightening a 110-day cycle to 80 pulls revenue forward and lifts the rate without adding a single rep.
Subtract starting ARR from ending ARR, divide by starting ARR and multiply by 100. Go from $4M to $6M in a year and that is (6 minus 4) / 4 x 100 or 50% annual growth.
It depends on scale. Under $1M ARR, expect triple digits. Between $1M and $10M the venture standard is roughly doubling each year. Past $10M ARR, holding above 60% lands you in the top tier.
They measure the same thing on different clocks. MRR growth is monthly and noisier. ARR growth annualises the run rate and smooths the noise, which is why boards and investors track ARR.
Yes. ARR growth captures the net movement of the recurring base, so expansion and contraction both count. A high rate driven by expansion is healthier than one driven only by new logos.
Predictably. Most SaaS companies see the rate roughly halve every couple of years as the base grows. Planning for that decay is how you set targets your team can actually hit.
If the curve is bending the wrong way, the fix is usually in retention or cycle time, not a new channel. Book a 30-minute audit and we will find where the rate is leaking. No sales sequence.
Book the 30-minute audit →